Instead it will focus on developing an open-access solution better suited to its needs. India has announced that it will not, after all, be joining cOAlition S. ( Open & Shut?, Thursday, October 31, 2019) VijayRaghavan, Principal Scientific Adviser, Government of India Given its size and influence, UC’s decision was hailed as “a shot heard around the academic world”. In addition, UC wanted Elsevier to provide this at a reduced cost. Rive gauche ysl bag plus#The talks had collapsed because of Elsevier’s failure to offer UC what it demanded: a new-style Big Deal in which the university got access to all of Elsevier’s paywalled content plus OA publishing rights for all UC authors – what UC refers to as a Read and Publish agreement. When news broke early in 2019 that the University of California had walked away from licensing negotiations with the world’s largest scholarly publisher (Elsevier), a wave of triumphalism spread through the OA Twittersphere. ( Open & Shut?, Monday, November 18, 2019) Open access: Could defeat be snatched from the jaws of victory? Under the agreement – which is planned to go into effect this Spring – UC Libraries will automatically pay the first $1,000 of the article processing charge (APC) incurred when UC authors choose to publish in a PLOS journal. The Public Library of Science (PLOS) and the University of California (UC) have today announced a two-year agreement designed to make it easier and more affordable for UC researchers to publish in the non-profit open-access publisher’s suite of seven journals. ( Open & Shut?, Wednesday, February 19, 2020) PLOS CEO Alison Mudditt discusses new OA agreement with the University of California In 2001, the Director of Libraries at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Kenneth Frazier, warned warned the library community of the dangers of signing big deals, or any comprehensive licensing agreement, with commercial publishers. From the start, however, there were doubters. When first introduced, the attraction of the Big Deal was immediately obvious, since it allows a library to buy its faculty access to most, if not all, of a publisher’s journals at a much lower “cost per article” (discounted) rate. The Big Deal, has been a topic of heated discussion among librarians for some twenty or more years now. Unbundling the Big Deal: An interview with SUNY’s Shannon Pritting Here institutions are asked to commit to paying an annual fee to a publisher, with the aim of pooling sufficient funds to cover the costs of making all the papers in a journal open access. As this requires authors (or their funders or institutions) to pay an article-processing charge every time they publish a paper it is felt to be discriminatory, especially for non-funded researchers and those based in the Global South (see, for instance, here, here and here).Īs a result, various alternative approaches are emerging intended to move away from APCs, including crowdfunding and membership schemes. We are today seeing growing dissatisfaction with the pay-to-publish model for open access. ( Open & Shut?, Wednesday, November 04, 2020) Read more »Ĭommunity Action Publishing: Broadening the Pool With the greater space available I also took the opportunity to expatiate at considerable length in doing so. As we did not have time to discuss them all during the interview, I decided to publish my answers on my blog. Prior to the interview, Rascoe sent me a list of questions. ( Open & Shut?, Wednesday, December 02, 2020)Įarlier this year I was invited to discuss with Georgia Institute of Technology librarian Fred Rascoe my eBook Open access: Could defeat be snatched from the jaws of victory? for Lost in the Stacks, the research library rock and roll show he hosts. Open Access: Information wants to be free? Open Access movement, whose development he has been following for more than a decade. Richard takes a particular interest in the Richard Poynder is an independent journalist and blogger specialising in information technology, Rive gauche ysl bag software#The State of Open Access Predatory publishing Institutional Repositories Green OA Gold OA Self-archiving Copyright Basement Interviews OA Interviews OA Essays Open Access in Serbia Open Access in India Open Access in Egypt ScienceDirect Open Access in California OA in Latin America Open Access in the Humanities MDPI Preprints Selecting Reviewers Global Research Council OA Big Deal Open Notebook Science Elsevier Gates Foundation OA in South Africa OA in France SSRN OA & the Humanities Timothy Gowers Harold Varmus Peter Suber OA in Poland OA Embargoes Big Deal Finch Report Jeffrey Beall ALPSP OA Mandates PLOS Peer Review Springer BioMed Central Free Software Digital Preservation Dove Medical OA in Russia Radical OA Almost OA HEFCE Frontiers
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |